[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1430331934.23761.100.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:25:34 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH v2 10/20] pmem: use ida
Hi Dan,
Thanks for the update. This version of the patchset enumerates our NFIT
table properly. :-)
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 14:25 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> In preparation for the pmem driver attaching to pmem-namespaces emitted
> by libnd, convert it to use an ida instead of an always increasing
> atomic index. This provides a bit of stability to pmem device names in
> the presence of driver re-bind events.
:
> @@ -122,20 +123,26 @@ static struct pmem_device *pmem_alloc(struct device *dev, struct resource *res)
> {
> struct pmem_device *pmem;
> struct gendisk *disk;
> - int idx, err;
> + int err;
>
> err = -ENOMEM;
> pmem = kzalloc(sizeof(*pmem), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pmem)
> goto out;
>
> + pmem->id = ida_simple_get(&pmem_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
nd_pmem_probe() is called asynchronously via async_schedule_domain
(). We have seen a case that the region#->pmem# binding becomes
inconsistent across a reboot when there are 8 NVDIMM cards (reported by
Robert Elliott). This leads user to access a wrong device.
I think pmem id needs to be assigned before async_schedule_domain(), and
cascaded to nd_pmem_probe().
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists