[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150501072733.GD19852@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 09:27:33 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: George Beshers <gbeshers@....com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Hedi Berriche <hedi@....com>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] UV: NMI: simple dump failover if kdump fails
* George Beshers <gbeshers@....com> wrote:
> UV: NMI: simple dump failover if kdump fails
>
> The ability to trigger a kdump using the system NMI command
> was added by
>
> commit 12ba6c990fab50fe568f3ad8715e81e356552428
> Author: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
> Date: Mon Sep 23 16:25:03 2013 -0500
>
> When kdump is works it is preferable to the set of backtraces
(spelling error)
> that dump provides; however a number of things can go wrong and
> the backtraces are much more useful than nothing.
>
> The two most common reason for kdump not to be available are
(spelling error)
> a problem during boot or the kdump daemon fails to start.
(spelling error)
> In either case the call to crash_kexec() returns unexpectedly;
> when this happens uv_nmi_kdump() also returns with the
> uv_nmi_kexec_failed flag set. This condition now causes a
> standard dump.
'standard dump' == printing an NMI backtrace on all CPUs?
> One other minor change is that dump now generates both the
> show_regs() stack trace and the uv_nmi_dump_ip{,_hdr} information
> that is generated by the "ips" action; the additional information
> has proved to be useful.
Looks like a useful change.
> -/* Dump this cpu's state */
> +/*
> + * Dump this cpu's state. Note that "kdump" only happens
s/CPU's
> + * when crash_kexec() has failed and we are providing the user
> + * a standard dump instead.
So this sentence does not parse for me: kdump only happens if kdump
fails??
> + */
> static void uv_nmi_dump_state_cpu(int cpu, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> const char *dots = " ................................. ";
>
> - if (uv_nmi_action_is("ips")) {
> - if (cpu == 0)
> - uv_nmi_dump_cpu_ip_hdr();
> -
> - if (current->pid != 0)
> - uv_nmi_dump_cpu_ip(cpu, regs);
> -
> - } else if (uv_nmi_action_is("dump")) {
> + if (uv_nmi_action_is("dump") || uv_nmi_action_is("kdump")) {
> printk(KERN_DEFAULT
> "UV:%sNMI process trace for CPU %d\n", dots, cpu);
pr_info().
> show_regs(regs);
> }
> +
> + if (cpu == 0)
> + uv_nmi_dump_cpu_ip_hdr();
> +
> + if (current->pid != 0)
> + uv_nmi_dump_cpu_ip(cpu, regs);
What is an 'ip header'? If it's not an Internet IP address then it's
probably horribly named.
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_KEXEC)
#ifdef
> @@ -502,9 +507,9 @@ static void uv_nmi_kdump(int cpu, int master, struct pt_regs *regs)
> crash_kexec(regs);
>
> pr_emerg("UV: crash_kexec unexpectedly returned, ");
> + atomic_set(&uv_nmi_kexec_failed, 1);
Why is this flag an atomic variable?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists