[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150501093602.GF10239@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 11:36:02 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, slaoub@...il.com,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, jroedel@...e.de,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/mce/amd: Introduce deferred error interrupt
handler
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:16:30PM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> I used the term as it is an interrupt due to the deferred error.
> Would 'deferred_err_interrupt' be more apt? Maybe 'irq_deferred_error_count'
> for the counter?
Yeah, I think it is important to stick to the "deferred error" naming
as those are interrupts announcing deferred errors and not deferred
interrupts.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists