linux-kernel - Re: [RFCv3 PATCH 37/48] sched: Determine the current sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55439728.2040307@arm.com>
Date:	Fri, 01 May 2015 16:09:28 +0100
From:	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To:	"pang.xunlei@....com.cn" <pang.xunlei@....com.cn>
CC:	Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
	"mturquette@...aro.org" <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	"yuyang.du@...el.com" <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv3 PATCH 37/48] sched: Determine the current sched_group
 idle-state

On 01/05/15 10:56, pang.xunlei@....com.cn wrote:
> Hi Dietmar,
> 
> Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com> wrote 2015-05-01 AM 04:17:51:
>>
>> Re: [RFCv3 PATCH 37/48] sched: Determine the current sched_group
> idle-state
>>
>> On 30/04/15 06:12, pang.xunlei@....com.cn wrote:
>> > linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org wrote 2015-02-05 AM 02:31:14:

[...]

> Thanks for explaining this in graphic detail.
> 
> From what I understood, let's just assume ARM TC2 has an extra
> MC-level C-States SPC(assuming its power is 40 for the big).
> 
> Take the power value from "RFCv3 PATCH 25/48":
> static struct idle_state idle_states_cluster_a15[] = {
>                  { .power = 70 }, /* WFI */
>                  { .power = 25 }, /* cluster-sleep-b */
>         };
> 
> static struct idle_state idle_states_core_a15[] = {
>                  { .power = 0 }, /* WFI */
>        };
> 
> Then we will get the following idle energy table?
> static struct idle_state idle_states_core_a15[] = {
>                { .power = 70 }, /* WFI */
>                 { .power = 0 }, /* SPC*/
>         };
> 
> static struct idle_state idle_states_cluster_a15[] = {
>                { .power = 40 }, /* SPC */
>                { .power = 25 }, /* cluster-sleep-b */
>        };
> 
> Is this correct?

Yes. It's the same C-state configuration we have on our ARMv8 big.LITTLE
JUNO (Cortex A57, A53) board.

# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state*/name
WFI
cpu-sleep-0
cluster-sleep-0

> If this is right, there may be a bug.
> 
> For MC-level CPU0:
> sg_mask=0x1 sge->nr_idle_states=2 sge->idle_states_below=0
> cpuidle_idx=0 group_idx=1 shallowest_state=1
> 
> See, group_idle_state() finally returns 1 as CPU0's MC-level
> idle engery model index, and this is obviously wrong.

Yes, I can see this problem too.

> So, I think for
> "int group_idx = cpuidle_idx - sge->idle_states_below + 1;"
> 
> Maybe we shouldn't add the extra 1 for lowest levels?

Maybe. In any case we will have to resolve this issue in the next
version. Thanks for pointing this out!

[...]

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/