[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150501154713.GD1949@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 11:47:13 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Justin M. Forbes" <jforbes@...oraproject.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, "v4.0" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] block: loop: avoiding too many pending per work I/O
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 08:05:45AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Maybe just cap max_active to NR_OF_LOOP_DEVS * 16 or sth? But idk,
> > how many concurrent workers are we talking about and why are we
> > capping per-queue concurrency from worker pool side instead of command
> > tag side?
>
> Also we probably should have per device workqueues to start with..
Yeah, that's an option. The only thing is that each workqueue would
have to be tagged WQ_RESCUER and end up with separate rescuer task,
which usually isn't big a deal but there are setups where a lot of
loop devices are used and it may sting a bit.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists