lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5543C348.9060004@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 01 May 2015 11:17:44 -0700
From:	Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, corbet@....net,
	keescook@...omium.org, qat-linux@...el.com, jwboyer@...hat.com,
	richard@....at, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, steved@...hat.com,
	vgoyal@...hat.com, james.l.morris@...cle.com, jkosina@...e.cz,
	zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] crypto: add PKE API

On 05/01/2015 09:04 AM, David Howells wrote:
>> +config CRYPTO_PKE
> I would prefer CRYPTO_PKEY and pkey rather than pke generally and algo rather
> than alg where possible - this will have more consistency with what we have
> now.
> 
> I understand, however, that in core crypto code, 'alg' is used.

I'm fine with pkey. Herbert do you have preference with regards 'algo' vs 'alg'?

>>  #define CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_AHASH		0x0000000a
>> > +#define CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_PKE		0x0000000b
>> >  #define CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_RNG		0x0000000c
> Will filling a hole cause a problem with something that got obsoleted?

I hope not. I checked as far back as 2.6.18 and I don't see any clash.
Herbert, what do you think?

> 
>> +struct pke_request {
>> > +	struct crypto_async_request base;
>> > +	const struct public_key *pk;
>> > +	const struct public_key_signature *pks;
>> > +};
> I recommend:
> 
> 	pk -> key or pkey
> 	pks -> sig or signature

no problem

> 
>> +	u8 pub_mpis;	/* Number of MPIs in public key */
>> > +	u8 sec_mpis;	/* Number of MPIs in secret key */
>> > +	u8 sig_mpis;	/* Number of MPIs in a signature */
> Keep member names as:
> 
> 	u8		n_pub_mpi;	/* Number of MPIs in public key */
> 	u8		n_sec_mpi;	/* Number of MPIs in secret key */
> 	u8		n_sig_mpi;	/* Number of MPIs in a signature */

same here.
thanks

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ