[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CDD0100C-8761-4979-9B9A-2D52713C9A1E@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 03:12:31 +0000
From: "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
"HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org" <HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org>,
"Simmons, James A." <simmonsja@...l.gov>
Subject: Re: [HPDD-discuss] [PATCH 2/11] Staging: lustre: fld: Use kzalloc
and kfree
Hello!
On May 2, 2015, at 4:14 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:13:11PM +0000, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
>>>> The patch was submitted.
>>>> But it depends on a symbol that's not exported.
>>>> I was not able to change that.
>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg83997.html
>>>
>>> But you were given a hint on how to change that :)
>>
>> Well, the hint amounted to "don't do vmalloc if you cannot live with the
>> GFP_KERNEL" allocations.
>>
>
> Which email is that?
Ah, my memory is playing tricks, it appears.
There was just a pointer to the "other discussions" where this advice was given it appears.
> I only see where David says to implement vmalloc_node_gfp() and the talk
> was about if that makes sense from a style perspective and then dies.
>
> Anyway, this only seems to affect ptlrpc_alloc_rqbd() since I think
> that's the only place which calls OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR(). The rest can use
> __vmalloc().
I guess so.
Bye,
Oleg--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists