[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150504103836.GE4082@shlinux1.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 18:38:37 +0800
From: Dong Aisheng <b29396@...escale.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@...escale.com>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<mturquette@...aro.org>, <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<Ranjani.Vaidyanathan@...escale.com>, <b20596@...escale.com>,
<r64343@...escale.com>, <b20788@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 5/5] clk: introduce clk_core_enable_lock and
clk_core_disable_lock functions
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:10:43PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/15, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > This can be usefully when clock core wants to enable/disable clocks.
> > Then we don't have to convert the struct clk_core to struct clk to call
> > clk_enable/clk_disable which is a bit un-align with exist using.
> >
> > Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@...escale.com>
> > ---
>
> Yeah let's add this patch either before patch 4 or squash it into
> patch 4. Also, avoid adding more function prototypes please.
>
Will do it.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Regards
Dong Aisheng
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists