linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add initial configfs support for IIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55475052.8040105@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 04 May 2015 13:56:18 +0300
From:	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>
To:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC:	jlbec@...lplan.org, knaack.h@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, octavian.purdila@...el.com,
	pebolle@...cali.nl, patrick.porlan@...el.com,
	adriana.reus@...el.com, constantin.musca@...el.com,
	marten@...uitiveaerial.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add initial configfs support for IIO



On 05/03/2015 10:22 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 05/03/2015 09:20 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 26/04/15 20:35, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On 20/04/15 15:02, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>>>> This patchset introduces IIO software triggers, offers a way of
>>>> configuring
>>>> them via configfs and adds the IIO hrtimer based interrupt source to
>>>> be used
>>>> with software triggers.
>>>>
>>>> The arhitecture is now split in 3 parts, to remove all IIO trigger
>>>> specific
>>>> parts from IIO configfs core:
>>>>
>>>> (1) IIO software triggers - are independent of configfs.
>>>> (2) IIO configfs - offers a generic way of creating IIO objects. So
>>>> far we can
>>>>     create software triggers.
>>>> (3) IIO hrtimer trigger - is the first interrupt source for software
>>>> triggers
>>>>     (with syfs to follow). Each trigger type can implement its own
>>>> set of
>>>>     attributes.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v3:
>>>>     * addressed comments from Jonathan for previous version
>>>>     * https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/6/111
>>>
>>> Hi Daniel.
>>>
>>> Thanks for all your hard work on this.  I'm very pleased with the
>>> result.
>>> It's clean, remarkably compact and nice and extensible.
>>>
>>> The only reason I didn't apply it today (other than the odd nit) was
>>> because
>>> it's major new ABI for us so I'd ideally like a few of IIOs main
>>> reviewers
>>> to take a look before we take it.
>>>
>>> Lars, Harmut, Peter, others (our reviewer set is growing very fast!)
>>> if you
>>> guys have time and interest, please take a quick look at this and see
>>> if we've
>>> missed anything.
>>
>> Anyone intending to look at this?  I'm inclined to take it as is, but
>> know that
>> Lars for instance had a particular interest in this support (it was
>> his suggestion
>> in the first place I think!) so if you want more time to have a look,
>> then
>> let me know.
>
> Sorry, I know, I should have long taken a look at it. I'll try to do it
> tomorrow, if you don't hear anything else from me assume I'm ok with it.

I've sent v5 with fixes after Jonathan's last review. Lars please use
this for review :)

http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=143073652331007&w=2

thanks,
Daniel.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/