[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1430895155.3693.6.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 08:52:35 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, williams@...hat.com,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, fweisbec@...hat.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: question about RCU dynticks_nesting
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 23:06 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > 100000000 * stat() on isolated cpu
> >
> > NO_HZ_FULL off inactive housekeeper nohz_full
> > real 0m14.266s 0m14.367s 0m20.427s 0m27.921s
> > user 0m1.756s 0m1.553s 0m1.976s 0m10.447s
> > sys 0m12.508s 0m12.769s 0m18.400s 0m17.464s
> > (real) 1.000 1.007 1.431 1.957
> Does the attached patch help at all?
nohz_full
0m27.073s
0m9.423s
0m17.602s
Not a complete retest, and a pull in between, but I'd say that's a no.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists