[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1430895708.3693.10.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 09:01:48 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, williams@...hat.com,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, fweisbec@...hat.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: question about RCU dynticks_nesting
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 08:52 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 23:06 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > > 100000000 * stat() on isolated cpu
> > >
> > > NO_HZ_FULL off inactive housekeeper nohz_full
> > > real 0m14.266s 0m14.367s 0m20.427s 0m27.921s
> > > user 0m1.756s 0m1.553s 0m1.976s 0m10.447s
> > > sys 0m12.508s 0m12.769s 0m18.400s 0m17.464s
> > > (real) 1.000 1.007 1.431 1.957
>
>
> > Does the attached patch help at all?
>
> nohz_full
> 0m27.073s
> 0m9.423s
> 0m17.602s
>
> Not a complete retest, and a pull in between, but I'd say that's a no.
(well, a second is a nice "at all", just not a _huge_ "at all";)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists