linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] tracing: add trace event for memory-failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150506221745.3478fd92@grimm.local.home>
Date:	Wed, 6 May 2015 22:17:45 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc:	Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	"koct9i@...il.com" <koct9i@...il.com>,
	"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	"iamjoonsoo.kim@....com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	"luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
	"nasa4836@...il.com" <nasa4836@...il.com>,
	"gong.chen@...ux.intel.com" <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>,
	"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"jingle.chen@...wei.com" <jingle.chen@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] tracing: add trace event for memory-failure

On Thu, 7 May 2015 01:12:07 +0000
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 07:14:27PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
> > Hi Naoya,
> > 
> > Could you help to review and applied this series if possible.
> 
> Sorry for late response, I was offline for several days due to national
> holidays.
> 
> This patchset is good to me, but I'm not sure which path it should go through.
> Ordinarily, memory-failure patches go to linux-mm, but patch 3 depends on
> TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM patches, so this can go to linux-next directly, or go to
> linux-mm with depending patches.
> 
> Steven, Andrew, which way do you like?
> 

The TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM() patch set went into the 4.1 merge window. It
should be fine to base off of any of Linus's tags after or including
4.1-rc1.

I need to start converting other trace events for 4.2.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/