[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9365.1430996458@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 12:00:58 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Abelardo Ricart III <aricart@...nix.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MODSIGN: Change default key details [ver #2]
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
> are you fine with these two patches?
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/20/546
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/4/614
Yeah, I think so. Your reasoning on the first one is sound - but is it
possible for $(objtree) to != $(srctree) even when they're coincident. I like
Linus's use of the filechk macro on the second - but we shouldn't overwrite
keys someone has manually placed in the tree if the key generation template
changes due to git pull altering kernel/Makefile.
Sometimes I think makescript is like trying to program in Prolog - but worse.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists