linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <554B4BB6.2040302@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Thu, 07 May 2015 04:25:42 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review

On 05/06/2015 10:25 PM, Tyler Baker wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 5 May 2015 at 15:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 09:00:22PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release.
>>> There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Mon May  4 18:59:31 UTC 2015.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>        kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> -rc2 is out now that should work properly:
>>
>>          kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc2.gz
>
> The kernelci.org robot reported new boot failures in v3.19.7 on a
> variety of at91 boards[1][2][3]. I instructed the robot perform a boot
> bisection which yielded...
>

Can one of those boards be emulated with qemu, by any chance ?

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/