linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 7 May 2015 07:59:19 -0700
From:	Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review

On 7 May 2015 at 04:25, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> On 05/06/2015 10:25 PM, Tyler Baker wrote:
>>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On 5 May 2015 at 15:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 09:00:22PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release.
>>>> There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Mon May  4 18:59:31 UTC 2015.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>
>>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz
>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>>
>>> -rc2 is out now that should work properly:
>>>
>>>
>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc2.gz
>>
>>
>> The kernelci.org robot reported new boot failures in v3.19.7 on a
>> variety of at91 boards[1][2][3]. I instructed the robot perform a boot
>> bisection which yielded...
>>
>
> Can one of those boards be emulated with qemu, by any chance ?

With qemu-system 2.2... 'qemu-system-arm -machine help' does not list
any at91 based machine types. :(

>
> Guenter
>

Cheers,

Tyler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/