[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150507193851.GA15313@deathray>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 14:38:52 -0500
From: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] spi: omap2-mcspi: Add support for GPIO chipselects
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:27:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 02:20:19PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 07:58:31PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > makes things easier to review and helps people trying to understand the
>
> > Do you have any other suggestions or comments on the patch so that I
> > can incorporate those changes as well in the patch series?
>
> No, that's part of the "easier to review" bit.
The first two hunks are the only GPIO related code.
The rest is all conversion to transfer_one.
>
> > I noticed a few oddities in the code when converting.
>
> > For instance:
> > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c#L1225
>
> > What is the point of trying to print tx or rx given the if statement
> > insures that rx_buff and tx_buff are NULL?
>
> I expect it's just a buggy test.
Not sure I understand what you mean.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists