[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <554CA317.8050303@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 13:50:47 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
jiwang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
anton_bondarenko@...tor.com, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>,
Nicolae Rosia <nicolae.rosia@...il.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: imx: Revert "initialized DMA w/o HW flow enabled"
On 05/08/2015 01:30 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> <sebastian@...akpoint.cc> wrote:
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Can we enable the DMA support? Be aware that
>> + * at least IMX6 needs to load external SDMA firmware in
>> + * order work properly. The in-ROM firmware is not
>> + * wokring properly.
>> + */
>
> On my tests:
>
> Prior to this patch: with the internal ROM SDMA firmware I got UART
> issues when communicating through a Bluetooth module. With external
> SDMA firmware (version 3.1) it worked fine.
>
> With your patch applied: Bluetooth worked fine even with no external
> SDMA firmware, which does not match the comments you added.
Why doesn't it match the comment? The patch disables DMA so the SDMA
firmware does not matter.
> Can't you just remove these comments?
>
> Thanks
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists