linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to mout_apll and mout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 May 2015 09:31:43 +0530
From:	Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to
 mout_apll and mout_kpll clock.

Hi Krysztof,

Actually the patch is based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/389
I don't know how to measure the energy consumption when compared to
cpufreq-exynos.

I will update the commit log and resend it with you review.

-Anand Moon




On 8 May 2015 at 05:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> 2015-05-08 2:48 GMT+09:00 Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>:
>> Addition of CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to support Exynos5 cpu clk so that
>> correct divider values are re-calculated after both pre/post
>> clock notifiers had run for for mout_apll clock and mout_kpll clock.
> s/for for/for/
>
> Could you precise in commit message the observational effects
> *without* this patch? In other words: what is fixed? The divider will
> have incorrect values?
>
>>
>> Depend on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/388
>>
>> Tested on OdroidXU3 Board.
>
> Thanks for providing this information. However
> 1. Patch dependency should not be part of commit message, It simply
> won't provide any meaningful information when they are merged.
> 2. Similarly testing platform also is not always put in commit message.
>
> So just put them after separator (triple-dash).
>
> After fixing the commit message:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/