linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to mout_apll and mout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <554C3617.10906@samsung.com>
Date:	Fri, 08 May 2015 13:05:43 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>
Cc:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk samsung exynos5420 add CLK_RECALC_NEW_RATES flag to
 mout_apll and mout_kpll clock.

On 08.05.2015 13:01, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Krysztof,
> 
> Actually the patch is based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/3/389
> I don't know how to measure the energy consumption when compared to
> cpufreq-exynos.

It does not have to be energy consumption. It may be something else
visible, like wrong values for clock rates. I don't know, it is your
patch so you should know *what is fixed* (or changed).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/