[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5550964B.6020001@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:45:15 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
CC: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: irqchip: Break up high order allocations of kvm_irq_routing_table
On 11/05/2015 13:25, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> > It probably doesn't matter much indeed, but can you time the difference?
>> > kvm_set_irq_routing is not too frequent, but happens enough often that
>> > we had to use a separate SRCU instance just to speed it up (see commit
>> > 719d93cd5f5, kvm/irqchip: Speed up KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING, 2014-01-16).
> The results vary a lot, but what I can say for sure is that the
> kvm_set_irq_routing function takes at least twice as long (~10.000 vs
> ~22.000 cycles) as before on my AMD Kaveri machine (maximum was between
> 3-4 times as long).
>
> On the other side this function is only called 2 times at boot in my
> test, so I couldn't detect a noticable effect on the overall boot time
> of the guest (37 disks were attached).
Christian, can you test this?
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists