[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150511135526.GA6130@x>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 06:55:26 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clone: Support passing tls argument via C rather
than pt_regs magic
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:13:13PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * josh@...htriplett.org <josh@...htriplett.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 08:53:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@...el.com>
> > >
> > > Can you please clarify that SOB chain? It does not make any sense.
> >
> > Co-authored patch. We both worked on it together, and sadly git
> > doesn't support a commit with multiple authors, so this is the next
> > best thing.
>
> No, this is not a valid SOB chain.
>
> For 'co authored' patches you can add credits either to the file, as
> two copyright lines, or via the changelog, no need to mess up the SOB
> chain for that.
Fine, I'll write it another way.
Do you see any other issues with the patch other than the signoffs?
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists