linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] rcu: change function declaration to bool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150511115935.4d1d27c9@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2015 11:59:35 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
Cc:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] rcu: change function declaration to bool

On Mon, 11 May 2015 17:45:10 +0200
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at> wrote:

- sorry for being so complicated.

Nah, we are the ones being complicated.

> had been putting config info below in all patches - and in git log I do
> not see that information being included - anyway will move it up and 
> resend in a momemt.

Knowing what config option (or default config build) causes the issues
is helpful. As for what the patch is against, sometimes its best to say
what commit the patch fixes. That even has a tag for it.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/