linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] rcu: change function declaration to bool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150511162140.GA10108@opentech.at>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2015 18:21:40 +0200
From:	Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] rcu: change function declaration to bool

On Mon, 11 May 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Mon, 11 May 2015 17:45:10 +0200
> Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at> wrote:
> 
> - sorry for being so complicated.
> 
> Nah, we are the ones being complicated.
> 
> > had been putting config info below in all patches - and in git log I do
> > not see that information being included - anyway will move it up and 
> > resend in a momemt.
> 
> Knowing what config option (or default config build) causes the issues
> is helpful. As for what the patch is against, sometimes its best to say
> what commit the patch fixes. That even has a tag for it.
>
gave it one more shot - let me know if that fits - about time I get these
basics right... 

thx!
hofrat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/