linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drivers/gpio/gpiolib: Add support for removing registered consumer lookup table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdY47b6mzrSk99AQ19MnQarCCKaKqTQLejMyJjxtpjd6qA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 10:52:26 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@...el.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-pwm <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Povilas Staniulis <wdmonster@...il.com>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chih-Wei Huang <cwhuang@...roid-x86.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/8] drivers/gpio/gpiolib: Add support for
 removing registered consumer lookup table

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In case we unload and load a driver module again that is registering a
>> > lookup table, without this it will result in multiple entries. Provide
>> > an option to remove the lookup table on driver unload
>> >
>> > v2: Ccing maintainers
>> >
>> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
>> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
>> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@...el.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> I think the gpio/pwm and mfd parts would all need to go in through the
> same tree. i915 parts are decoupled. I guess I could do a branch with just
> those patches, tag it and then send a pull request to all 3 subsystems
> once it's reviewed. Would that be ok?

That's an immutable branch I guess, and yeah I think it's OK.
I usually only pull these in if/when there are conflicts in -next.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/