linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: wmi: Remove private %pUL implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87r3qm6lvg.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 14:06:27 +0200
From:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: wmi: Remove private %pUL implementation

On Fri, Mar 06 2015, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:15:30PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> The work performed by wmi_gtoa is equivalent to simply sprintf(out,
>> "%pUL", in), so one could replace its body by this. However, most
>> users feed the result directly as a %s argument to some other function
>> which also understands the %p extensions (they all ultimately use
>> vsnprintf), so we can eliminate some stack buffers and quite a bit of
>> code by just using %pUL directly.
>> 
>> In wmi_dev_uevent I'm not sure whether there's room for a
>> nul-terminator in env->buf, so I've just replaced wmi_gtoa with the
>> equivalent sprintf call.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
>
> Nice cleanup, thanks Rasmus. Queued for 4.1.

Hi Darren

This seems to have fallen through the cracks - I don't see it in
4.1-rc3.

Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/