lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 14:06:34 +0200 From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> To: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com> Cc: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, hengelein Stefan <stefan.hengelein@....de>, Andreas Ruprecht <andreas.ruprecht@....de> Subject: Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH_LPC18XX On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote: > - (B) Creating an immutable branch pulled into both trees, which > is better since it means the same hash is in both trees PS: This may seem idea but it's not. It means several subsystem-disparate patches will appear in several pull requests and you have to explain why it's so to Linus (the big penguin, not me). So again, orthogonal trees are preferred, if possible. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists