linux-kernel - Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbKfVrAb3inBrPBaC4p=A-4OAOnKd-zB6bXj=JXkdF1ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 May 2015 14:06:34 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>
Cc:	Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
	hengelein Stefan <stefan.hengelein@....de>,
	Andreas Ruprecht <andreas.ruprecht@....de>
Subject: Re: lpc18xx: undefined Kconfig option ARCH_LPC18XX

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:

> - (B) Creating an immutable branch pulled into both trees, which
>   is better since it means the same hash is in both trees

PS: This may seem idea but it's not. It means several
subsystem-disparate patches will appear in several pull requests
and you have to explain why it's so to Linus (the big penguin,
not me). So again, orthogonal trees are preferred, if
possible.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/