[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1431493763.26897.36.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 22:09:23 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...erainc.com>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] target/configfs: Convert mappedlun + SCSI MIBs to
RCU reader
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 13:58 -0700, Andy Grover wrote:
> On 05/12/2015 02:25 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> >
> > This patch converts fabric independent configfs link/unlink to use
> > RCU read path macros for se_node_acl->lun_entry_hlist access.
> >
> > It also converts SCSI MIB configfs show attribute code to use
> > RCU read path macros for se_node_acl->lun_entry_hlist access.
> >
> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c | 35 +++---
> > drivers/target/target_core_stat.c | 180 +++++++++++++--------------
> > 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c b/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c
> > index 6cb4828..0dab6d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_fabric_configfs.c
> > @@ -123,16 +123,16 @@ static int target_fabric_mappedlun_link(
> > * which be will write protected (READ-ONLY) when
> > * tpg_1/attrib/demo_mode_write_protect=1
> > */
> > - spin_lock_irq(&lacl->se_lun_nacl->device_list_lock);
> > - deve = lacl->se_lun_nacl->device_list[lacl->mapped_lun];
> > - if (deve->lun_flags & TRANSPORT_LUNFLAGS_INITIATOR_ACCESS)
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + deve = target_nacl_find_deve(lacl->se_lun_nacl, lacl->mapped_lun);
> > + if (deve && deve->lun_flags & TRANSPORT_LUNFLAGS_INITIATOR_ACCESS)
>
> Why do we still need TRANSPORT_LUNFLAGS_INITIATOR_ACCESS? Isn't deve
> being not-NULL enough?
>
Yep, I think this can go as well. Dropping now.
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists