[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150513053233.GA20663@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 07:32:33 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...erainc.com>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] target: Convert se_node_acl->device_list[] to
RCU hlist
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:08:51PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> The series is bisectable. With patch #1 in place ->device_list[] is
> still kzalloc()'ed, but new RCU pointer assignments are made into
> lun_entry_hlist[].
>
> Squashing the RCU reader paths (#2-6) for merge is OK, but it's still
> nice to break up reader / updater changes into separate patches.
Having the full data structure switch over in one patch really makes
reviewing and understning the change a lot easier. But changes to
say move to a mutex should indeed stay separate. So patches 1-6
really should be mostly one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists