linux-kernel - Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH V1 3/6] rtc: da9062: DA9062 RTC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <555355C1.9090907@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 06:46:41 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	"Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	LINUXKERNEL <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RTCLINUX <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
	DEVICETREE <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	LINUXINPUT <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH V1 3/6] rtc: da9062: DA9062 RTC driver

On 05/13/2015 06:37 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 13/05/2015 at 06:04:47 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote :
>> Don't know how this is handled for rtc drivers, but in other subsystems
>> we just live with the original name. I don't see a need to rename a driver
>> just because it starts supporting more hardware, and xxx is weird anyway
>> since it suggests everything from 000 to 999, which is much worse than
>> just sticking with 9063.
>>
>
> Yes, in particular if at some point in time a new IP matching those xxx
> is completely different from the previous one. I'm not fond of renaming
> the driver either but if diasemi thinks that what they want, I'm open to
> let it happen. But clearly, I don't want to end up in a situation like
> the tlv320aic where you don't know which driver correspond to which
> chip:
>
> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic31xx.c
> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic31xx.h
> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic32x4.c
> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic32x4.h
> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic3x.c
> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320aic3x.h
> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320dac33.c
> sound/soc/codecs/tlv320dac33.h
>
> Go figure that the tlv320aic3104 can be supported by both tlv320aic3x.c
> and tlv320aic32x4.c but not tlv320aic31xx.c...
>

Unfortunately that is exactly what is going to happen.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/