linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] of: base: upgrade initcall level of of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqL_pEZ0qMgk3j7fwuWLTVZEm2UpPR=e4jAMN4shHAtNnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 May 2015 08:46:47 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: base: upgrade initcall level of of_init from core to pure

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/05/15 23:55, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Commit 5590f3196b29 ("drivers/core/of: Add symlink to device-tree from
>>> devices with an OF node") adds the symlink `of_node` for each device
>>> pointing to it's device tree node while creating/initialising it.
>>>
>>> However the devicetree sysfs is created and setup in of_init which is
>>> executed at core_initcall level. For all the devices created at the core
>>> initcall before of_init, the following error is thrown:
>>>          "Error -2(-ENOENT) creating of_node link"
>>
>>
>> What devices have you seen the problem with? I'd rather see if those
>> devices could now be moved later.
>>
>
> Yes that's exactly what I attempted first after seeing the issue, but
> failed miserably due to the dependency mentioned below.
>
> It's on vexpress platforms with the following initcall sequence:
> 1. core - vexpress system control registers block(sysreg)
> 2. postcore - vexpress configuration controllers(config-bridge)
> 3. arch - customize_machine->of_platform_populate

I'd argue we should move this later, but that's a big hammer.

> of_platform_populate creates amba_devices which need clocks and
> depend on the vexpress-config and clocks which in turn depends on
> vexpress-sysreg

Personally, I think all this stuff is overly complicated and perhaps
too much stuff in DT. vexpress-config and vexpress-sysreq are tightly
coupled and perhaps should be handled with 1 driver. Also, calling
vexpress-config a bus is a bit of an abuse.

> I would like to know if with commit 5590f3196b29 are we mandating
> all the device creation to be done only after core_initcall or
> is it OK get the errors mentioned above and ignore them as harmless
> as the comment in the code states:
> "An error here doesn't warrant bringing down the device"

I don't think it really changed with that commit, but there has to be
some mechanism for core/infrastructure to initialize before
drivers/devices.

>>> Since the core_initcall is the earliest point where devices get
>>> registered, push initcall level of of_init from core to pure so that
>>> the devicetree sysfs is ready before any devices are registered.
>>
>>
>> Read the definition of pure:
>>
>>   * A "pure" initcall has no dependencies on anything else, and purely
>>   * initializes variables that couldn't be statically initialized.
>>
>
> Yes I read and was bit hesitant initially to do this change, but found
> no better way. I posted mainly to discuss other possibilities to solve
> the issue.

Perhaps of_init should not be an initcall at all and it should go into
driver_init().

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/