[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3eab9a1-b24a-42a3-8a7c-062423d92f70@phunq.net>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 13:24:12 -0700
From: Daniel Phillips <daniel@...nq.net>
To: Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>
Cc: Martin Steigerwald <martin@...htvoll.de>,
David Lang <david@...g.hm>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Howard Chu <hyc@...as.com>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, <tux3@...3.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: xfs: does mkfs.xfs require fancy switches to get decent performance? (was Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?)
On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 1:02:34 PM PDT, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:37:41PM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
>> On 05/13/2015 12:09 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>> ...
>
> Daniel, please listen to Martin. He speaks a fundamental truth
> here.
>
> As you know, I am also interested in Tux3, and would love to
> see it as a filesystem option for NAS servers using Samba. But
> please think about the way you're interacting with people on the
> list, and whether that makes this outcome more or less likely.
Thanks Jeremy, that means more from you than anyone.
Regards,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists