[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1431621795-25722-5-git-send-email-rabin@rab.in>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 18:43:15 +0200
From: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
To: jesper.nilsson@...s.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cris-kernel@...s.com,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] CRIS: fix switch_mm() lockdep splat
With lockdep support implemented on CRISv32, we get the following splat.
switch_mm() can be called both from the scheduler() (with interrupts
disabled) and from flush_old_exec (via activate_mm()), with interrupts
enabled. Fix it by disabling interrupts in activate_mm(), similar to
powerpc and hexagon.
t======================================================
[ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
3.19.0-08802-g20bc9f1-dirty #323 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
init/1 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
(mmu_context_lock){+.+...}, at: [<c0009290>] switch_mm+0x22/0xc6
and this task is already holding:
(&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<c01a0756>] __schedule+0x5e/0x648
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&rq->lock){-.-.-.} -> (mmu_context_lock){+.+...}
but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&rq->lock){-.-.-.}
... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at:
[<c002b03c>] scheduler_tick+0x28/0x5e
[<c0007c6c>] timer_interrupt+0x4e/0x6a
[<c0043ac4>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x54/0x13c
[<c004343c>] generic_handle_irq+0x2a/0x36
to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
(mmu_context_lock){+.+...}
... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
... [<c0039e60>] __lock_acquire+0x8f8/0x1d9c
[<c0009290>] switch_mm+0x22/0xc6
[<c009c260>] flush_old_exec+0x500/0x5d4
[<c00da4c6>] load_elf_phdrs+0x7a/0x84
[<c00dbdb0>] load_elf_binary+0x21c/0x13b4
[<c009cdb6>] do_execve+0x22/0x2c
[<c001dcf2>] ____call_usermodehelper+0x0/0x154
[<c000581e>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0xe/0x14
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(mmu_context_lock);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&rq->lock);
lock(mmu_context_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&rq->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by init/1:
#0: (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<c01a0756>] __schedule+0x5e/0x648
Call Trace:
[<c019fe9e>] printk+0x0/0x4e
[<c00368f8>] print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x0/0x15c
[<c0048628>] print_stack_trace+0x0/0x88
[<c0038912>] __lock_is_held+0x3e/0x5e
[<c003b894>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xcc
[<c01a50c4>] _raw_spin_lock+0x44/0x7a
[<c0009290>] switch_mm+0x22/0xc6
[<c01a06f8>] __schedule+0x0/0x648
[<c01a0d76>] schedule+0x36/0x7c
[<c0037d04>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x0/0x1e
[<c0004e18>] do_work_pending+0x30/0xd4
[<c000591a>] _work_pending+0xe/0x12
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
---
arch/cris/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/cris/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/cris/include/asm/mmu_context.h
index 1d45fd6..349acfd 100644
--- a/arch/cris/include/asm/mmu_context.h
+++ b/arch/cris/include/asm/mmu_context.h
@@ -11,7 +11,14 @@ extern void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
#define deactivate_mm(tsk,mm) do { } while (0)
-#define activate_mm(prev,next) switch_mm((prev),(next),NULL)
+static inline void activate_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ switch_mm(prev, next, NULL);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
/* current active pgd - this is similar to other processors pgd
* registers like cr3 on the i386
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists