[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505160049210.4225@nanos>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 00:53:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc: y2038@...ts.linaro.org, baolin.wang@...aro.org,
albert.aribaud@...ev.fr, john.stultz@...aro.org,
bamvor.zhangjian@...aro.org, ruchandani.tina@...il.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] y2038: use __kernel_timespec in sys_futex
On Wed, 6 May 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Conversion for sys_futex is particularly easy, we can use the unmodified
> compat_sys_futex on 32-bit systems to provide compatibility for 32-bit
> time_t, and change sys_futex to pass a __kernel_timespec, which matches
> what future libc implementations will use as their struct timespec.
Unless I'm missing something I doubt that you get away that easy. It
works on 32bit, but not on 64 bit with 32bit app support:
Native 64bit: sys_futex()
32bit timespec32: compat_sys_futex()
32bit timespec64: ?????
You cannot map that to sys_futex() because the pointer size differs.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists