linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 17/19] y2038: use __kernel_timespec in sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 16 May 2015 09:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc:	y2038@...ts.linaro.org, baolin.wang@...aro.org,
	albert.aribaud@...ev.fr, john.stultz@...aro.org,
	bamvor.zhangjian@...aro.org, ruchandani.tina@...il.com,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	libc-alpha@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/19] y2038: use __kernel_timespec in sys_futex

On Sat, 16 May 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > Conversion for sys_futex is particularly easy, we can use the unmodified
> > compat_sys_futex on 32-bit systems to provide compatibility for 32-bit
> > time_t, and change sys_futex to pass a __kernel_timespec, which matches
> > what future libc implementations will use as their struct timespec.
> 
> Unless I'm missing something I doubt that you get away that easy. It
> works on 32bit, but not on 64 bit with 32bit app support:
> 
> Native 64bit: 	   sys_futex()
> 32bit timespec32:  compat_sys_futex()
> 32bit timespec64:  ?????
> 
> You cannot map that to sys_futex() because the pointer size differs.

Ignore that. You are right. Review induced brainmelt....

       tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/