[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150518202803.GD24861@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:28:03 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7 V2] workqueue: introduce get_pwq_unlocked()
Hello, Lai.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:32:31PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> attrs management code may reuse existed pwq and it has open code
existing
> to do "lock();get_pwq();unlock()", we move this open code into
> get_pwq_unlocked().
>
> get_pwq_unlocked() will also be used in later patches to allow
> apply_wqattrs_prepare() to resue the original default or per-node pwq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
...
> +install:
> /* Install the new pwq. */
> mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
> old_pwq = numa_pwq_tbl_install(wq, node, pwq);
> - goto out_unlock;
> -
> -use_dfl_pwq:
> - mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
> - spin_lock_irq(&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock);
> - get_pwq(wq->dfl_pwq);
> - spin_unlock_irq(&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock);
> - old_pwq = numa_pwq_tbl_install(wq, node, wq->dfl_pwq);
> -out_unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
> put_pwq_unlocked(old_pwq);
> }
This doens't strike me as better. If we have other places where the
unlocked get is used, maybe, but that's not the case.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists