[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1431980468.21019.11.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 14:21:08 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...el.com,
Elliott@...com, pebolle@...cali.nl, mcgrof@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] mtrr, mm, x86: Enhance MTRR checks for KVA huge
page mapping
On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 22:01 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 01:31:59PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > Well, #2 and #3 are independent. That is, uniform can be set regardless
>
> Not #2 and #3 above - the original #2 and #3 ones. I've written them out
> detailed to show what I mean.
The original #2 and #3 are set independently as well. They do not depend
on each other condition being a specific value.
> > The caller is responsible for verifying the conditions that are safe to
> > create huge page.
>
> How is the caller ever going to be able to do anything about it?
The caller is the one who makes the condition checks necessary to create
a huge page mapping. mtrr_type_look() only returns how the given range
is related with MTRRs.
> Regardless, I'd prefer to not duplicate comments and rather put a short
> sentence pointing the reader to the comments over mtrr_type_lookup()
> where this all is being explained in detail.
>
> I'll fix it up.
I appreciate your help.
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists