[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150519212225.GD5093@merlin.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 17:22:25 -0400
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...radead.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] README: clarify redistribution requirements
covering patents
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:18:14PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> Your commit should include an update to the WHENCE file clearly
> >> identifying the licence under which the firmware is available, and
> >> -that it is redistributable. If the licence is long and involved, it's
> >> +that it is redistributable. Being redistributable includes ensuring
> >> +the firmware license provided includes an implicit or explicit
> >> +patent grant to end users to ensure full functionality of device
> >> +operation with the firmware. If the licence is long and involved, it's
> >
> >
> > Just nitpicking here, but there is 'license' and 'licence' being used here.
> > Better stick to one and preferably 'license'.
>
> Fixed, will submit a v2.
>
Heh, it doesn't help that we now have LICENSE.* and LICENCE.* in the
tree as well. :/ I believe, at least in my Commonwealth english, that
licence is the file, and license is the action of licensing. I should
probably rename the LICENSE.* files in the tree to match.
--Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists