lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150519062046.GB4448@schokonusskuchen.bad>
Date:	Tue, 19 May 2015 08:20:47 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:	Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@...il.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] i2c-core: Fix typo in comment

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:25:08AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

> You do not need to mention the count of your older patches here.

While technically true...

> When you mentioned 11/11, it meant your current submission is a patchset
> of 11 patches. So when the maintainer decides to apply your patch he will
> search your remaining 10 patches because he needs to apply them in series.

... this doesn't matter much for such cleanup series. They obviously
have no dependency and I assume that the other patches are for other
subsystems. This is fine, too.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ