linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/11] i2c-core: Fix typo in comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150519065025.GA5061@sudip-PC>
Date:	Tue, 19 May 2015 12:20:25 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@...il.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] i2c-core: Fix typo in comment

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:20:47AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:25:08AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> 
> > You do not need to mention the count of your older patches here.
> 
> While technically true...
> 
> > When you mentioned 11/11, it meant your current submission is a patchset
> > of 11 patches. So when the maintainer decides to apply your patch he will
> > search your remaining 10 patches because he needs to apply them in series.
> 
> ... this doesn't matter much for such cleanup series. They obviously
> have no dependency and I assume that the other patches are for other
> subsystems. This is fine, too.
yes, I also asssumed the same. But it turned out that he has sent 10/10
on 15th May, and then 11/11 , 12/12 , 13/13 and 14/14 on May 18th.

So I assumed that it is a wrong setting while creating his patch.
isn't it?

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/