linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] radeon: Deinline indirect register accessor functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <A3397C8B8B789E45844E7EC5DEAD89D06364C87C@satlexdag05.amd.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 May 2015 23:06:36 +0000
From:	"Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>
To:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
	"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>
CC:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] radeon: Deinline indirect register accessor functions

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Denys Vlasenko [mailto:vda.linux@...glemail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 6:50 PM
> To: Koenig, Christian
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko; Deucher, Alexander; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] radeon: Deinline indirect register accessor functions
> 
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Christian König
> <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
> >> r600_uvd_ctx_rreg: 111 bytes, 4 callsites
> >> r600_uvd_ctx_wreg: 113 bytes, 5 callsites
> >> eg_pif_phy0_rreg: 106 bytes, 13 callsites
> >> eg_pif_phy0_wreg: 108 bytes, 13 callsites
> >> eg_pif_phy1_rreg: 107 bytes, 13 callsites
> >> eg_pif_phy1_wreg: 108 bytes, 13 callsites
> >> rv370_pcie_rreg: 111 bytes, 21 callsites
> >> rv370_pcie_wreg: 113 bytes, 24 callsites
> >> r600_rcu_rreg: 111 bytes, 16 callsites
> >> r600_rcu_wreg: 113 bytes, 25 callsites
> >> cik_didt_rreg: 106 bytes, 10 callsites
> >> cik_didt_wreg: 107 bytes, 10 callsites
> >> tn_smc_rreg: 106 bytes, 126 callsites
> >> tn_smc_wreg: 107 bytes, 116 callsites
> >> eg_cg_rreg: 107 bytes, 20 callsites
> >> eg_cg_wreg: 108 bytes, 52 callsites
> 
> > Sorry haven't noticed that before:
> >
> > radeon_device.c is most likely not the right place for the non-inlined
> > functions. Please move them into to the appropriate files for each
> > generation.
> 
> Will do (probably tomorrow, not today).

Is this whole exercise really worthwhile?  This will be the 3rd or 4th time these have been inlined/uninlined.

> 
> Can you help me here a bit?
> There are LOTS of  *.c files in drm/radeon/.
> I guess r600_ functions should go into r600.c,

Yes.

> rv370_ to rv730_dpm.c (right?),

No.  rv370_ should go in r300.c

> but some of the function names are less clear (to me).
> 
> Where would you like eg_pif_phyN_r/wreg() go? evergreen.c?

Yes.

> Should eg_cg_r/wreg() also go to this file?

Yes.

> 
> cik_didt_r/wreg() - to cik.c?

Yes.

> 
> tn_smc_r/wreg()? Is tn = trinity? so, trinity_smc.c?

ni.c

Alex