[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C6287702A945AC47BE5DB5DFD4B5C6DD018B6A03@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 04:57:00 +0000
From: "Zha, Qipeng" <qipeng.zha@...el.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yang, Fei" <fei.yang@...el.com>,
"Zhong, Huiquan" <huiquan.zhong@...el.com>,
"Chen, Jason CJ" <jason.cj.chen@...el.com>,
"Zheng, Qi" <qi.zheng@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] regmap: add virtual PMIC IPC bus support
Hi
>Why is this being added to the regmap core rather than being implemented
>in using the reg_write() and reg_read() callbacks in the core driver for
>the PMIC?
Thanks. I don't receive this message before in eamil.
Current regmap only support register access using several bus: i2c, spi, ac97 ...
But register access for intel pmic are done by hardware ipc, so we add such support in regmap core,
To make pmic subdevice drivers can use generic regmap r/w API to access registers.
Best wishes
Qipeng
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@...nel.org]
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 7:21 PM
To: Zha, Qipeng
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Yang, Fei; Zhong, Huiquan; Chen, Jason CJ; Zheng, Qi
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: add virtual PMIC IPC bus support
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:10:04AM +0000, Zha, Qipeng wrote:
> Hi Broonie
>
> Can you help comment on this patch ?
> We do really want to leverage current regmap framework to acess intel pmic devices.
> So please evaluate this driver, thanks.
Please don't send contentless pings, and please refer to my original response to one of the copies you sent:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/20/425
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists