linux-kernel - RE: [RESEND][ PATCH v3] irqchip/gicv3-its: ITS table size should not be smaller than PSZ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505202206560.4225@nanos>
Date:	Wed, 20 May 2015 22:09:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@...escale.com>
cc:	"marc.zyngier@....com" <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"Lian M.H." <Minghuan.Lian@...escale.com>
Subject: RE: [RESEND][ PATCH v3] irqchip/gicv3-its: ITS table size should
 not be smaller than PSZ

On Wed, 20 May 2015, Stuart Yoder wrote:

> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@...utronix.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 2:26 PM
> > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> > Cc: marc.zyngier@....com; jason@...edaemon.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> > kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Lian Minghuan-B31939
> > Subject: Re: [RESEND][ PATCH v3] irqchip/gicv3-its: ITS table size should not be smaller than PSZ
> > 
> > On Wed, 20 May 2015, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > 
> > > when allocating a device table, if the requested allocation
> > > is smaller than the default granule size of the ITS
> > > then, we need to round up to the default size
> > >
> > 
> > So who wrote that patch? That's not a valid SOB chain ....
> 
> Minghuan wrote the original patch (v1,v2), making the functional change.
> I wrote/added the comments and submitted v3, after discussing with
> Minghuan.
> 
> Given that, what is the correct signed-off-by chain?

From: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@...escale.com>

Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@...escale.com>
[ Stuart: Added comments and massaged changelog]
Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@...escale.com>

So the authorship gets attributed to Minghuan and it's noticed in the
changelog that you added comments and the changelog updates and then
sent the patch.

I'll apply it with that change, ok?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/