[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520200902.GA11631@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 22:09:02 +0200
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@....ntt.co.jp>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] KVM: x86: pass kvm_mmu_page to gfn_to_rmap
2015-05-19 19:25+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> This is always available, and later we could also use the role to look
> up the right memslots array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu_audit.c
> @@ -192,10 +192,11 @@ static void audit_write_protection(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> u64 *sptep;
> struct rmap_iterator iter;
>
> - if (sp->role.direct || sp->unsync || sp->role.invalid)
> + if (sp->role.direct || sp->unsync || sp->role.invalid ||
> + sp->role.level != PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
> return;
>
> - rmapp = gfn_to_rmap(kvm, sp->gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
Why were we forcing PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL for all levels?
Thanks.
> + rmapp = gfn_to_rmap(kvm, sp->gfn, sp);
>
> for_each_rmap_spte(rmapp, &iter, sptep)
> if (is_writable_pte(*sptep))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists