[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520201248.GA24014@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 22:12:48 +0200
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@....ntt.co.jp>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] KVM: x86: pass struct kvm_mmu_page to
account/unaccount_shadowed
2015-05-19 19:25+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> Prepare for multiple address spaces this way, since a VCPU is not available
> where unaccount_shadowed is called. We will get to the right kvm_memslots
> 1truct through the role field in struct kvm_mmu_page.
struct kvm_mmu_page contains enough information to retrieve a memslot;
is it impractical to cache the memslot pointer there?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists