[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <555BFDCF.4020303@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 11:21:51 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, "x86 @ kernel . org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Introduce a mechanism to allocate PCI IRQ on demand
On 2015/5/19 21:35, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
>
>> This patch set introduces a mechanism to allocate PCI IRQ on demand and
>> free it when not used anymore by hooking pci_device_probe() and
>> pci_device_remove().
>>
>> It will be used to track IOAPIC pin usage on x86 so we could support
>> IOAPIC hot-removal.
>
> Bjorn, any opinion on this?
Hi Bjorn,
With this patch applied, how about removing this workaround
from arch/x86/pci/irq.c?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
if (io_apic_assign_pci_irqs && pci_routeirq) {
struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
/*
* PCI IRQ routing is set up by pci_enable_device(), but we
* also do it here in case there are still broken
drivers that
* don't use pci_enable_device().
*/
printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Routing PCI interrupts for all
devices because \"pci=routeirq\" specified\n");
for_each_pci_dev(dev)
pirq_enable_irq(dev);
}
-------------------------------------------------------
Thanks!
Gerry
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists