[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1505200947140.4225@nanos>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 09:47:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, "x86 @ kernel . org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] PCI, MSI: Optionally free legacy PCI IRQ when enabling
MSI/MSI-X
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/5/16 5:02, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > This is a bit odd. With your proposed change we'll have:
> >
> > alloc_legacy_irq()
> >
> > msi[x]_enable()
> > free_legacy_irq()
> >
> > msi[x]_disable()
> > alloc_legacy_irq()
> Hi Thomas,
> It's for safety. I'm not sure whether the device driver will
> make use of legacy IRQ after calling msi[x]_disable(). I have concerns
> about following pattern in PCI device drivers:
> ---------------------------------------------------
> if (enable_msi() == SUCCESS) {
> if (allocate_resource_for_msi() == SUCCESS)
> return;
> disable_msi();
> }
> use_legacy_irq()
Fair enough.
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists