[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520130312.GL3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:12 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer triggers NULL pointer derefreence in
x86_schedule_events
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 01:40:31PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:32:56PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > I think it is more likely related to the bitmask (idxmsk). But then
> > > it is always allocated with the constraint even with the HT bug
> > > workaround. So most, likely the index is bogus and you touch outside
> > > the idxmsk[] array.
> >
> > [428232.701319] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
> >
> > But the thing really tried to touch NULL, not some random address that
> > faulted.
> >
> > As always, Vince has found us a good puzzle ;-)
>
> so the Haswell machine turned up the following oops that looks related.
>
> Yet again we are ending up with a NULL pointer in the constraint table
> somehow.
>
> This maps to
>
> static bool __perf_sched_find_counter(struct perf_sched *sched)
>
> c = sched->events[sched->state.event]->hw.constraint;
>
> /* Prefer fixed purpose counters */
> ---> if (c->idxmsk64 & (~0ULL << INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED)) {
>
> ffffffff81029ce4: 48 8b 55 88 mov -0x78(%rbp),%rdx
> ffffffff81029ce8: 48 8b 04 c2 mov (%rdx,%rax,8),%rax
> ffffffff81029cec: ba 20 00 00 00 mov $0x20,%edx
> ffffffff81029cf1: 48 8b 98 98 01 00 00 mov 0x198(%rax),%rbx
> ffffffff81029cf8: 4c 85 23 test %r12,(%rbx)
>
>
> [306672.100641] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
> [306672.109653] IP: [<ffffffff81029cf8>] perf_assign_events+0xa8/0x290
So new in this release is:
static void intel_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
struct perf_event *event)
{
...
/* cleanup dynamic constraint */
if (c && (c->flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC))
event->hw.constraint = NULL;
}
Which is the only place that value is ever cleared...
Now, I've not quite figured out how that can intersect with scheduling,
typically we only call put_event_constraints() when we're done with the
event.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists