[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520131525.GG18673@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:15:25 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer triggers NULL pointer derefreence in
x86_schedule_events
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:03:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So new in this release is:
>
> static void intel_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
> struct perf_event *event)
> {
> ...
>
> /* cleanup dynamic constraint */
> if (c && (c->flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC))
> event->hw.constraint = NULL;
> }
>
> Which is the only place that value is ever cleared...
>
> Now, I've not quite figured out how that can intersect with scheduling,
> typically we only call put_event_constraints() when we're done with the
> event.
Related to that; intel_commit_scheduling() has:
c = event->hw.constraint;
if (!c)
return;
Stephane, how can that ever be?
x86_schedule_events() does:
hwc->constraint = get_event_constraints()
for all events, and intel_get_event_constraints() will _always_ return a
valid constraint -- &unconstrained if nothing else.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists