[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520140426.GB126473@ubuntu-hedt>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 09:04:26 -0500
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
serge@...lyn.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <david.woodhouse@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joey Lee <jlee@...e.de>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mricon@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] linux-firmware key arrangement for firmware signing
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:02:32PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> This begs the question on how we'd manage keys for firmware signing on
> linux-firmare. Since the keys are x509 keys we need a CA. Based on some initial
> discussions it would seem we'd need the Linux Foundation to create a key, this
> would be embedded in the kernel and that key would be used to sign Kyle's key.
> Kyle would in turn use his key for signing linux-firmware files. David, Kyle,
> did I summarize this correctly ?
I raised the question of key revocation when we discussed this on irc,
but it wasn't answered to my satisfaction. If a key signed by the
kernel-embedded key is compromised, how can that key be revoked so that
it is no longer trusted?
Someone mentioned UEFI blacklists, which I don't know much about, but
not all systems have UEFI. The only reliable option that comes to mind
for me is an in-kernel blacklist of keys which should no longer be
trusted.
Seth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists