[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150520141854.GE28678@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:18:55 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linux-CGroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, memcg: Try charging a page before setting page
up to date
On Wed 20-05-15 16:03:53, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I am wondering why do we still have both
> __SetPageUptodate and SetPageUptodate when they are same. Historically
> they were slightly different but this is no longer the case.
Bahh, I am blind and failed spot a difference game. It is __set_bit vs
set_bit. Sorry about the noise.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists